Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMKAX vs NMBAX
HMKAX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts HMKAX vs NMBAX
HMKAX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMKAX vs. NMBAX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMKAX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.53B vs. HMKAX (70.8M). NMBAX pays higher dividends than HMKAX: NMBAX (3.21) vs HMKAX (2.98). HMKAX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: HMKAX (11 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). HMKAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). NMBAX (27.00) and HMKAX (26.00) have comparable annual turnover. HMKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). HMKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: HMKAX (2000) vs NMBAX (2500). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. NMBAX (5.53). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.70 vs. HMKAX (2.36).
| HMKAX | NMBAX | HMKAX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.64 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.64 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.568 | 1.123 | 140% |
| Front Load | 5% | 3% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8M | 9.53B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 3.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 5.53 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.89 | 11.11 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.36 | 4.70 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.34 | 16.08 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers