HMN
Price
$44.94
Change
+$0.16 (+0.36%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
KINS
Price
$15.21
Change
-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
215.08M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs KINS

Header iconHMN vs KINS Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs KINSBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$44.94
Change+$0.16 (+0.36%)
Volume$400.27K
Capitalization1.83B
Kingstone Companies
Price$15.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Volume$129.76K
Capitalization215.08M
HMN vs KINS Comparison Chart in %
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. KINS commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a StrongBuy and KINS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $44.94 vs. KINS: $15.21)
Brand notoriety: HMN and KINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 196% vs. KINS: 57%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.83B vs. KINS: $215.08M
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.83B. KINS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $215.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $128.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than HMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KINS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.16% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

KINS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.83B) has a higher market cap than KINS($215M). HMN has higher P/E ratio than KINS: HMN (13.30) vs KINS (7.42). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 17.346 vs. KINS (0.465). KINS has less debt than HMN: KINS (5.06M) vs HMN (548M). HMN has higher revenues than KINS: HMN (1.58B) vs KINS (186M).
HMNKINSHMN / KINS
Capitalization1.83B215M851%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.3460.4653,730%
P/E Ratio13.307.42179%
Revenue1.58B186M851%
Total CashN/A133M-
Total Debt548M5.06M10,828%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs KINS: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
KINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2214
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3340
SMR RATING
1..100
7923
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (79) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HMN (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNKINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYAOF28.90N/A
N/A
Ryanair Holdings Plc
TWODF1.34N/A
N/A
Taylor Wimpey Plc
KLYG0.13N/A
N/A
Kelyniam Global, Inc.
APPIF10.44N/A
N/A
APPIER GROUP INC.
QTIH6.27-0.39
-5.86%
QT Imaging Holdings, Inc.

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
+0.36%
SAFT - HMN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
THG - HMN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
CINF - HMN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
L - HMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ORI - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
-0.59%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
PLMR - KINS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
HMN - KINS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
ORI - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
LMND - KINS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More