HMN
Price
$45.57
Change
-$0.38 (-0.83%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.85B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KINS
Price
$14.29
Change
+$0.20 (+1.42%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
202.45M
112 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs KINS

Header iconHMN vs KINS Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs KINSBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$45.57
Change-$0.38 (-0.83%)
Volume$245.64K
Capitalization1.85B
Kingstone Companies
Price$14.29
Change+$0.20 (+1.42%)
Volume$206.83K
Capitalization202.45M
HMN vs KINS Comparison Chart in %
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. KINS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and KINS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $45.57 vs. KINS: $14.31)
Brand notoriety: HMN and KINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 104% vs. KINS: 152%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.85B vs. KINS: $202.45M
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.85B. KINS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $202.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMN is a better buy in the long-term than KINS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMN is a better buy in the short-term than KINS.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

KINS is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.85B) has a higher market cap than KINS($202M). HMN has higher P/E ratio than KINS: HMN (11.54) vs KINS (6.36). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 18.991 vs. KINS (-5.167). KINS has less debt than HMN: KINS (5.06M) vs HMN (548M). HMN has higher revenues than KINS: HMN (1.58B) vs KINS (186M).
HMNKINSHMN / KINS
Capitalization1.85B202M918%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.991-5.167-368%
P/E Ratio11.546.36181%
Revenue1.58B186M851%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt548M5.06M10,828%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs KINS: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
KINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3443
SMR RATING
1..100
7423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7785
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (36) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (74) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (57) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (85) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNKINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPMCX19.990.02
+0.10%
Invesco Main Street Mid Cap C
HSLTX47.96N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth R5
DRRIX16.78-0.01
-0.06%
BNY Mellon Global Real Return - I
JECTX17.39-0.03
-0.17%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq C
TRNZX22.46-0.07
-0.31%
T. Rowe Price International Stock Z

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then THG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-0.83%
THG - HMN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
ORI - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
CINF - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
SAFT - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
HIG - HMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
+1.56%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
HMN - KINS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
UFCS - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
PLMR - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
L - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More