KINS
Price
$19.69
Change
+$0.22 (+1.13%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
285.04M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$113.03
Change
+$0.31 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
23.11B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KINS vs L

KINS vs L Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KINS vs. L commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KINS is a StrongBuy and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (KINS: $19.69 vs. L: $113.03)
Brand notoriety: KINS and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KINS: 48% vs. L: 87%
Market capitalization -- KINS: $285.04M vs. L: $23.11B
KINS [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $285.04M. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $23.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $132.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KINS and L are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +3.79% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

KINS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.67% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($23.1B) has a higher market cap than KINS($285M). L has higher P/E ratio than KINS: L (13.87) vs KINS (7.96). KINS YTD gains are higher at: 18.104 vs. L (7.454). KINS has less debt than L: KINS (4.12M) vs L (8.93B). L has higher revenues than KINS: L (18.2B) vs KINS (238M).
KINSLKINS / L
Capitalization285M23.1B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.1047.454243%
P/E Ratio7.9613.8757%
Revenue238M18.2B1%
Total CashN/A7.51B-
Total Debt4.12M8.93B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KINS vs L: Fundamental Ratings
KINS
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8988
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
357
SMR RATING
1..100
3292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4233
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KINS's Valuation (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as L (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (35) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (92) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as L (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KINSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WTSGX27.650.10
+0.36%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
QISIX15.610.01
+0.06%
Pear Tree Polaris Intl Opps Instl
IAXAX5.33N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr A
RTLCX98.50-0.17
-0.17%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Large Cap C
NBGTX32.15-0.15
-0.46%
Neuberger Large Cap Growth Tr

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.28%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
CNA - L
80%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
CINF - L
72%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
THG - L
69%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More