Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HMSFX (73.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSFX (9.13) vs SMRPX (4.66). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). HMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. HMSFX (-3.79). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 203.58 vs. SMRPX (157.40).
| HMSFX | SMRPX | HMSFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.02 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.05 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.637 | 4.198 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.7M | 1.24B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.13 | 4.66 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.79 | 0.86 | -441% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.05 | 59.11 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.58 | 157.40 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement