Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a StrongBuy and SMRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. HMSFX (80.4M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSFX (8.19) vs SMRPX (4.58). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSFX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). HMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.23 vs. HMSFX (18.77). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 194.78 vs. SMRPX (151.22).
| HMSFX | SMRPX | HMSFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.02 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.05 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.050 | 1.462 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.4M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.19 | 4.58 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.77 | 23.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.12 | 52.58 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 194.78 | 151.22 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement