Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison
Open Charts HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. HMSFX (78.2M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSFX (7.47) vs SMRPX (3.74). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSFX (13 years) vs SMRPX (11 years). HMSFX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.03). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). HMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). HMSFX (22.24) and SMRPX (22.16) have marching annual gain over last year. HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 166.48 vs. SMRPX (140.12).
| HMSFX | SMRPX | HMSFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.99 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.03 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.531 | 21.954 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.2M | 1.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.47 | 3.74 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.24 | 22.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.03 | 84.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.48 | 140.12 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.56 | 137.01 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement