Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMVAX vs MVCAX
HMVAX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts HMVAX vs MVCAX
Hartford MidCap Value A
Price$15.89
Change+$0.25 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
HMVAX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMVAX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jul 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMVAX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HMVAX (1.14B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than HMVAX: MVCAX (0.87) vs HMVAX (0.69). HMVAX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: HMVAX (24 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). HMVAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). HMVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and HMVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMVAX: MVCAX (1000) vs HMVAX (2000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.41 vs. HMVAX (-7.29). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.40 vs. HMVAX (28.51).
| HMVAX | MVCAX | HMVAX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.00 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.708 | 1.565 | 45% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 16.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.87 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.29 | -3.41 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.15 | 14.10 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.51 | 50.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.05 | 64.66 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement