Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNASX vs RGAFX
HNASX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts HNASX vs RGAFX
HNASX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNASX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNASX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HNASX (438M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than HNASX: RGAFX (0.46) vs HNASX (0.00). HNASX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: HNASX (26 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). HNASX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). HNASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: RGAFX (250) vs HNASX (500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. HNASX (-8.26). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. HNASX (4.98).
| HNASX | RGAFX | HNASX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.605 | 9.276 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 438M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | 0.42 | -1,975% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.26 | 44.36 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.98 | 14.74 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.37 | 109.80 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement