Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNASX vs RGAGX
HNASX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HNASX vs RGAGX
HNASX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNASX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNASX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HNASX (438M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HNASX: RGAGX (0.51) vs HNASX (0.00). HNASX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HNASX (26 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). HNASX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). HNASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: RGAGX (250) vs HNASX (500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. HNASX (-8.26). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. HNASX (4.98).
| HNASX | RGAGX | HNASX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.605 | 9.321 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 438M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | 0.49 | -1,689% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.26 | 44.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.98 | 15.00 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.37 | 110.30 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement