Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNASX vs RGAGX
HNASX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HNASX vs RGAGX
HNASX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNASX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNASX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HNASX (450M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HNASX: RGAGX (0.51) vs HNASX (0.00). HNASX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HNASX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). HNASX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). HNASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: RGAGX (250) vs HNASX (500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. HNASX (-1.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. HNASX (8.33).
| HNASX | RGAGX | HNASX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.301 | 7.335 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | 4.75 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.28 | 41.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.33 | 17.74 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.30 | 106.44 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement