Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNSGX vs WCMLX
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HNSGX vs WCMLX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Retirement
Price$15.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMLX (41.1M). HNSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HNSGX (0.46) vs WCMLX (0.00). HNSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HNSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HNSGX (0.80). WCMLX (83.00) and HNSGX (79.00) have comparable annual turnover. WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNSGX: WCMLX (100000) vs HNSGX (1000000). HNSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.45 vs. WCMLX (-2.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. HNSGX (-12.47).
| HNSGX | WCMLX | HNSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.163 | 1.400 | 512% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 41.1M | 4,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | -2.18 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.62 | 20.96 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.47 | -0.99 | 1,263% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement