Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNSGX vs WCMLX
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HNSGX vs WCMLX
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). HNSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HNSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HNSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HNSGX (0.80). HNSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNSGX: WCMLX (100000) vs HNSGX (1000000). HNSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.32 vs. WCMLX (25.84). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. HNSGX (-0.52).
| HNSGX | WCMLX | HNSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.299 | 9.375 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 52.4M | 5,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.32 | 25.84 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.68 | 32.13 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.52 | -0.07 | 790% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement