Advertisement
HNST vs VRM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNST is a Hold and VRM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HNST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HNST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HNST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HNST (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +6.15% price change this week, while VRM (@Savings Banks) price change was -17.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2709.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
HNST is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.54% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Savings Banks (-3.30% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| HNST | VRM | HNST / VRM | |
| Capitalization | 299M | 101M | 296% |
| EBITDA | 13.9M | -15.09M | -92% |
| Gain YTD | -61.400 | 285.828 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.58 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 390M | 11.6M | 3,362% |
| Total Cash | 72.1M | 14.3M | 504% |
| Total Debt | 17.5M | 779M | 2% |
| HNST | VRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
HNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNST has been loosely correlated with GRWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNST jumps, then GRWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNST | 100% | +10.08% | ||
| GRWG - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| RH - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| FND - HNST | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| CHPT - HNST | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| LESL - HNST | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
VRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRM | 100% | -4.35% | ||
| HNST - VRM | 41% Loosely correlated | +10.08% | ||
| CPRT - VRM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CVNA - VRM | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
| LE - VRM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| BBBY - VRM | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.08% | ||
More | ||||