HOCFF
Price
$271.61
Change
+$1.49 (+0.55%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
20.23B
RYM
Price
$36.91
Change
-$0.79 (-2.10%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOCFF vs RYM

Header iconHOCFF vs RYM Comparison
Open Charts HOCFF vs RYMBanner chart's image
Hochtief AG
Price$271.61
Change+$1.49 (+0.55%)
Volume$2
Capitalization20.23B
RYTHM
Price$36.91
Change-$0.79 (-2.10%)
Volume$123
Capitalization73.11M
HOCFF vs RYM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RYM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOCFF vs. RYM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOCFF is a Buy and RYM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HOCFF: $256.38 vs. RYM: $36.51)
Brand notoriety: HOCFF and RYM are both not notable
HOCFF represents the Engineering & Construction, while RYM is part of the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOCFF: 30% vs. RYM: 46%
Market capitalization -- HOCFF: $20.23B vs. RYM: $73.11M
HOCFF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $20.23B. RYM’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $73.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $217.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $15.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOCFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRYM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HOCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RYM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the long-term than RYM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RYM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RYM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the short-term than RYM.

Price Growth

HOCFF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.57% price change this week, while RYM (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -9.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +335.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -3.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-3.06% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOCFF($20.2B) has a higher market cap than RYM($73.1M). HOCFF YTD gains are higher at: 89.207 vs. RYM (25.940). HOCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.42B vs. RYM (-36.21M). HOCFF has more cash in the bank: 5.83B vs. RYM (41M). RYM has less debt than HOCFF: RYM (40.6M) vs HOCFF (668M). HOCFF has higher revenues than RYM: HOCFF (37B) vs RYM (12.3M).
HOCFFRYMHOCFF / RYM
Capitalization20.2B73.1M27,633%
EBITDA2.42B-36.21M-6,680%
Gain YTD89.20725.940344%
P/E Ratio19.91N/A-
Revenue37B12.3M300,813%
Total Cash5.83B41M14,227%
Total Debt668M40.6M1,645%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOCFF: Fundamental Ratings
HOCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOCFFRYM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RYM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMAR28.90N/A
N/A
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Mar
MAXJ27.97-0.01
-0.04%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
XMPT21.80-0.02
-0.09%
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
DBA26.84-0.06
-0.22%
Invesco DB Agriculture
DFAC38.15-0.20
-0.52%
Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

HOCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOCFF and RYM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOCFF and RYM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOCFF
1D Price
Change %
HOCFF100%
-5.61%
RYM - HOCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
ACSAY - HOCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
EFGSY - HOCFF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFGSF - HOCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - HOCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

RYM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYM has been loosely correlated with OBSJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYM jumps, then OBSJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RYM
1D Price
Change %
RYM100%
-3.16%
OBSJF - RYM
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HOCFF - RYM
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
FLR - RYM
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
AMRC - RYM
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.22%
KYWAF - RYM
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More