HOMB
Price
$31.40
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.27B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INDB
Price
$85.97
Change
+$0.47 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.05B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOMB vs INDB

HOMB vs INDB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Home BancShares (HOMB) vs. Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Home BancShares (HOMB) posted a record full-year profit of over $475 million in 2025, driven by an industry-leading net interest margin of 4.61% and a sub-40% efficiency ratio.
  • Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) delivered stronger stock price momentum, with a one-year return of approximately 32% versus roughly 11% for HOMB, partly reflecting successful integration of its Enterprise Bancorp acquisition.
  • HOMB offers higher profitability metrics — including a return on assets (ROA) above 2.0% — while INDB trades at a higher valuation multiple, suggesting the market is pricing in continued post-merger execution.
  • Both regional banks maintain robust capital cushions, with HOMB reporting a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 16.3% and INDB holding tangible common equity to tangible assets of 9.88%.
  • The two institutions serve different geographic footprints: HOMB operates across the Sun Belt (Arkansas, Florida, Texas) while INDB is concentrated in the Northeast (Massachusetts and surrounding markets).
  • Each company is pursuing growth through acquisitions, with HOMB announcing a pending deal for Mountain Commerce Bank and INDB having recently closed its Enterprise Bancorp transaction.

Introduction

Regional banks often fly under the radar compared to their money-center peers, yet they can offer compelling combinations of profitability, dividend growth, and disciplined capital allocation. This comparison examines two well-regarded regional bank holding companies — HOMB (Home BancShares, Inc., parent of Centennial Bank) and INDB (Independent Bank Corp., parent of Rockland Trust Company) — to help investors understand how these institutions stack up across key dimensions including profitability, growth strategy, stock performance, and market positioning. Both have demonstrated resilience and operational discipline through varying interest-rate environments, making this side-by-side assessment relevant for investors evaluating exposure to the regional banking sector.

HOMB Overview and Recent Performance

HOMB, headquartered in Conway, Arkansas, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary Centennial Bank and serves customers across Arkansas, Florida, Texas, South Alabama, and New York City. The company has built a reputation for consistent, best-in-class profitability among regional banks. In recent quarters, HOMB delivered standout financial results: for the full year 2025, the company reported record net income exceeding $475 million — an 18% year-over-year increase — alongside record revenue of approximately $1.09 billion. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) surged 20% to $2.41.

Key profitability metrics underscore HOMB's operational strength. The company posted an ROA of 2.05% and an adjusted efficiency ratio of 41.29% for 2025, with the fourth quarter dipping below 40% — a threshold few U.S. banks achieve. Net interest margin (NIM), a critical measure of lending profitability, reached 4.61% in the most recent quarter, placing HOMB among the top performers in its peer group. Loan growth totaled $922 million (6.24%) for the year, while the company also returned significant capital to shareholders through $81.3 million in share repurchases and an increased quarterly dividend. In recent weeks, HOMB also announced a pending acquisition of Mountain Commerce Bank, signaling an expansion into Tennessee and continued appetite for accretive deals.

INDB Overview and Recent Performance

INDB, based in Rockland, Massachusetts, serves as the holding company for Rockland Trust Company, a well-established commercial and retail banking franchise in the Northeast. The bank's recent market activity has been shaped heavily by its acquisition of Enterprise Bancorp, Inc., which closed in the third quarter of 2025 and meaningfully expanded INDB's balance sheet and market presence. For the fourth quarter of 2025, INDB reported GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income of $75.3 million, or $1.52 per diluted share; on an operating basis — excluding merger-related costs — net income reached $84.4 million, or $1.70 per share.

The Enterprise integration has shown encouraging early signs, with the company retaining nearly all client-facing personnel and experiencing minimal customer attrition. INDB's NIM expanded 15 basis points sequentially to 3.77% in the fourth quarter, supported by declining deposit costs. Total assets now stand at approximately $24.9 billion, while loan balances reached $18.5 billion. Commercial and industrial (C&I) lending has been a particular bright spot, growing 9% organically in 2025 and now representing 25% of total loans. The company returned $164 million of capital to shareholders during 2025, including $61 million in share repurchases, and announced a new $150 million repurchase authorization. Analysts have responded favorably: Keefe, Bruyette & Woods upgraded INDB to Outperform in October 2025, and the consensus analyst rating currently stands at Moderate Buy with an average price target near $92.

Trending AI Robots

Beyond traditional fundamental analysis, a growing number of traders and investors are turning to AI-powered tools to navigate shifting markets with greater speed and precision. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's best-performing AI Trading Bots — drawn from a library of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. These bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, with recent performance data showing annualized returns ranging from approximately 34% to over 230% across sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, fintech, and energy. Win rates among featured bots have ranged from roughly 60% to over 89%, with some strategies delivering profit factors above 4.0. Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) power these bots, processing billions of market data points to generate real-time buy and sell signals. Only the bots most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. Explore the full selection of Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are resonating in today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both HOMB and INDB are well-managed regional bank holding companies, their profiles diverge in several meaningful ways that may appeal to different types of investors.

Profitability and Efficiency: HOMB holds a clear edge in profitability metrics. Its ROA above 2.0% and efficiency ratio below 40% are exceptional by regional banking standards. INDB's operating ROA of 1.34% and efficiency profile, while solid, reflect the near-term costs of integrating a large acquisition. HOMB's NIM of 4.61% also substantially exceeds INDB's 3.77%, reflecting differences in loan mix, deposit base composition, and geographic market dynamics.

Growth Trajectory and Scale: INDB has grown more aggressively through M&A (mergers and acquisitions), with the Enterprise deal transforming its balance sheet and adding scale in contiguous markets. Post-merger, INDB holds approximately $24.9 billion in total assets compared to HOMB's $22.9 billion. However, HOMB's organic loan growth of over 6% in 2025 demonstrates that it is not reliant solely on acquisitions for expansion.

Stock Price Momentum and Valuation: INDB has delivered superior recent market returns, gaining roughly 32% over the trailing twelve months and 18% year-to-date — substantially outpacing HOMB's approximately 11% one-year return and 13% year-to-date gain. This performance discrepancy suggests that the market is rewarding INDB for successful merger execution. On valuation, HOMB trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 12.8, compared to roughly 15.4 for INDB — a gap that partly reflects INDB's stronger price momentum and post-merger growth narrative.

Geographic and Risk Considerations: HOMB's Sun Belt footprint exposes it to faster-growing populations and economies, but also to higher real-estate sensitivity. INDB's Northeast concentration provides stability in mature, wealth-oriented markets, though it faces a more competitive banking landscape. Both maintain strong capital cushions, with HOMB's CET1 ratio of 16.3% providing a particularly wide buffer above regulatory requirements.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of INDB in the current environment, though not without important caveats. INDB's stronger price momentum, positive post-merger earnings trajectory, and improving operating metrics — including expanding NIM, growing C&I loan portfolios, and a rising tangible book value — present a compelling near-term catalyst profile. The stock's 32% one-year return and analyst upgrade activity further suggest that AI models tracking trend consistency and relative strength would identify INDB as the higher-momentum vehicle. However, from a pure profitability and efficiency standpoint, HOMB remains the fundamentally stronger institution, and AI models weighting valuation factors more heavily may favor HOMB's lower P/E multiple and superior ROA. The probabilistic assessment is that INDB currently holds the momentum advantage, while HOMB offers the deeper value and quality profile — making the choice dependent on whether one's strategy prioritizes trend-following dynamics or fundamental value factors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HOMB vs. INDB commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOMB is a StrongBuy and INDB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HOMB: $31.35 vs. INDB: $85.50)
Brand notoriety: HOMB and INDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOMB: 60% vs. INDB: 35%
Market capitalization -- HOMB: $6.27B vs. INDB: $4.05B
HOMB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.27B. INDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HOMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOMB is a better buy in the long-term than INDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INDB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOMB is a better buy in the short-term than INDB.

Price Growth

HOMB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.45% price change this week, while INDB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

INDB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOMB($6.27B) has a higher market cap than INDB($4.05B). INDB has higher P/E ratio than HOMB: INDB (15.46) vs HOMB (12.95). INDB YTD gains are higher at: 18.913 vs. HOMB (15.414). HOMB has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. INDB (223M). INDB (776M) and HOMB (780M) have identical debt. HOMB has higher revenues than INDB: HOMB (1.11B) vs INDB (923M).
HOMBINDBHOMB / INDB
Capitalization6.27B4.05B155%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.41418.91382%
P/E Ratio12.9515.4684%
Revenue1.11B923M120%
Total Cash296M223M133%
Total Debt780M776M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOMB vs INDB: Fundamental Ratings
HOMB
INDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8777
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2665
SMR RATING
1..100
2836
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOMB's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INDB (90). This means that HOMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than INDB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INDB (65). This means that HOMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than INDB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as INDB (36). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to INDB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as INDB (47). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to INDB’s over the last 12 months.

INDB's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (50). This means that INDB’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOMBINDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INDB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVHD44.700.34
+0.77%
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility Hi Div ETF
BSMC40.890.21
+0.51%
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
DFLV42.050.12
+0.29%
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
FTIF28.97N/A
-0.01%
First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF
OEI26.30-0.03
-0.11%
Optimized Equity Income ETF

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
+0.74%
UBSI - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FULT - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
INDB - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UCB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
FNB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More

INDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INDB has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INDB jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INDB
1D Price
Change %
INDB100%
+0.20%
HOMB - INDB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
UBSI - INDB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ONB - INDB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
FULT - INDB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
CATY - INDB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More