HON vs MDU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HON is a Hold and MDU is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HON’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
| HON | MDU | HON / MDU | |
| Capitalization | 132B | 5.14B | 2,569% |
| EBITDA | 9.1B | 868M | 1,048% |
| Gain YTD | -8.015 | -6.094 | 132% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.85 | 10.78 | 221% |
| Revenue | 36.7B | 4.66B | 788% |
| Total Cash | 8.1B | 48.9M | 16,554% |
| Total Debt | 21.5B | 2.47B | 871% |
HON | MDU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDU's Valuation (87) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as HON (90) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to HON’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as HON (34) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to HON’s over the last 12 months.
HON's SMR Rating (30) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDU (93) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that HON’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDU’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as HON (49) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to HON’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HON (43) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than HON’s over the last 12 months.
| HON | MDU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 45% | 8 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSCS | 20.44 | 0.08 | +0.37% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| PSR | 90.43 | -2.64 | -2.84% |
| Invesco Active US Real Estate | |||
| RSPM | 30.38 | -1.72 | -5.36% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF | |||
| SEA | 11.86 | -0.77 | -6.06% |
| US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF | |||
| RSPG | 75.04 | -7.84 | -9.46% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF | |||
HON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HON has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HON jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HON | 100% | -4.31% | ||
| CODI - HON | 46% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| MATW - HON | 46% Loosely correlated | -8.07% | ||
| MDU - HON | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| IIIN - HON | 42% Loosely correlated | -6.53% | ||
| VMI - HON | 40% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
More | ||||
MDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDU has been loosely correlated with MATW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDU jumps, then MATW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | 100% | -1.47% | ||
| MATW - MDU | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.07% | ||
| TRC - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| NWPX - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.93% | ||
| CODI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| MLI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.69% | ||
More | ||||