HOPE
Price
$9.93
Change
-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
54 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$18.56
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOPE vs SFNC

Header iconHOPE vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts HOPE vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Hope Ban
Price$9.93
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Volume$23.77K
Capitalization1.34B
Simmons First National
Price$18.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.42B
HOPE vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HOPE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOPE vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOPE is a Hold and SFNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HOPE: $9.97 vs. SFNC: $18.55)
Brand notoriety: HOPE and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOPE: 47% vs. SFNC: 63%
Market capitalization -- HOPE: $1.34B vs. SFNC: $2.42B
HOPE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.34B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOPE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HOPE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HOPE and SFNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOPE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOPE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOPE is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

HOPE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.66% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than HOPE($1.34B). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than HOPE: SFNC (13.98) vs HOPE (10.04). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: -15.477 vs. HOPE (-16.747). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. HOPE (173M). SFNC has less debt than HOPE: SFNC (1.34B) vs HOPE (1.96B). SFNC has higher revenues than HOPE: SFNC (782M) vs HOPE (571M).
HOPESFNCHOPE / SFNC
Capitalization1.34B2.42B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.747-15.477108%
P/E Ratio10.0413.9872%
Revenue571M782M73%
Total Cash173M345M50%
Total Debt1.96B1.34B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOPE vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
HOPE
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7174
SMR RATING
1..100
109
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOPE's Valuation (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (24). This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (74). This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (10). This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (61). This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (24). This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOPESFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOPE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNWFX85.830.61
+0.72%
American Funds New World F3
TSUMX13.610.07
+0.52%
Thornburg Summit I
RPFIX10.760.05
+0.47%
Royce Premier Instl
ASMMX28.28N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit A
ASRYX8.10N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income Y

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-1.59%
UBSI - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.57%
HOPE - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BHLB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
UCB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
FFBC - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
More