It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYIBO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YIBO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +6.66% price change this week, while YIBO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.68%.
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
HPQ | YIBO | HPQ / YIBO | |
Capitalization | 26.5B | 66.8M | 39,671% |
EBITDA | 4.29B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -11.224 | -63.529 | 18% |
P/E Ratio | 10.31 | 9.54 | 108% |
Revenue | 54.3B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 2.7B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 11.9B | N/A | - |
HPQ | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ | YIBO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 16 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been closely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HPQ | 100% | +4.57% | ||
DELL - HPQ | 72% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
LOGI - HPQ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
CRSR - HPQ | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
WDC - HPQ | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that YIBO and NNDM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YIBO and NNDM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YIBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YIBO | 100% | -3.12% | ||
NNDM - YIBO | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
IONQ - YIBO | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.54% | ||
RGTI - YIBO | 13% Poorly correlated | +7.73% | ||
AGMH - YIBO | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HPQ - YIBO | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
More |