Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIAX vs RMEBX
HQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQIAX vs RMEBX
HQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HQIAX (4.81B). HQIAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQIAX (1.56) vs RMEBX (1.04). HQIAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQIAX (23 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HQIAX (0.97). HQIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQIAX: RMEBX (250) vs HQIAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. HQIAX (4.95). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. HQIAX (4.19).
| HQIAX | RMEBX | HQIAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.259 | 6.444 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.04 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 10.14 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.32 | 34.54 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.19 | 35.62 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.08 | 94.57 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement