Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIAX vs RMFCX
HQIAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQIAX vs RMFCX
HQIAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQIAX (4.88B). HQIAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HQIAX (1.46) vs RMFCX (1.16). HQIAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQIAX (23 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQIAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQIAX: RMFCX (250) vs HQIAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. HQIAX (4.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. HQIAX (4.94).
| HQIAX | RMFCX | HQIAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.911 | 9.137 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 8.88 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.81 | 34.84 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.94 | 37.23 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.42 | 91.06 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement