Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HQICX (4.84B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMEBX (1.04) vs HQICX (0.86). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMEBX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. HQICX (4.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. HQICX (-2.90).
| HQICX | RMEBX | HQICX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.826 | 5.801 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.84B | 115B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 9.98 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 34.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.90 | 32.93 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.78 | 89.84 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement