Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQICX (4.91B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMEBX (0.99) vs HQICX (0.73). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMEBX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. HQICX (6.91). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. HQICX (1.94).
| HQICX | RMEBX | HQICX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.570 | 9.416 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 8.96 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.31 | 32.63 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.94 | 36.13 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.71 | 90.64 | 36% |