Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMEBX
HQICX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQICX (4.88B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMEBX (1.00) vs HQICX (0.75). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMEBX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. HQICX (3.64). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. HQICX (0.66).
| HQICX | RMEBX | HQICX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.470 | 9.059 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 8.73 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 34.30 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | 36.28 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.84 | 89.36 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers