Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMFCX
HQICX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMFCX
HQICX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HQICX (4.84B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HQICX (0.86). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMFCX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. HQICX (4.96). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. HQICX (-2.90).
| HQICX | RMFCX | HQICX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.826 | 5.845 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.84B | 115B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 10.10 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 34.65 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.90 | 33.85 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.78 | 91.46 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers