Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMFCX
HQICX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMFCX
HQICX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQICX (4.91B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HQICX (0.73). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMFCX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. HQICX (6.91). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. HQICX (1.94).
| HQICX | RMFCX | HQICX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.570 | 9.496 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 9.09 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.31 | 33.16 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.94 | 37.08 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.71 | 92.36 | 35% |