Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HQISX (4.89B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQISX (1.47) vs RMEBX (1.04). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQISX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HQISX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HQISX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. HQISX (6.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.22 vs. HQISX (3.78).
| HQISX | RMEBX | HQISX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.777 | 7.291 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.04 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 10.44 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.01 | 33.41 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.78 | 35.22 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.61 | 94.08 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement