Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQISX (4.9B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQISX (1.31) vs RMEBX (0.99). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQISX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HQISX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HQISX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. HQISX (6.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. HQISX (6.20).
| HQISX | RMEBX | HQISX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.618 | 8.940 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.99 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 6.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.72 | 35.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.20 | 34.60 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.69 | 92.89 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement