Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMEBX
HQISX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQISX (4.97B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQISX (1.33) vs RMEBX (0.99). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQISX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HQISX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HQISX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. HQISX (6.43). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.32 vs. HQISX (5.62).
| HQISX | RMEBX | HQISX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.915 | 10.825 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.97B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 9.44 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.74 | 38.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.62 | 36.32 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.35 | 91.39 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement