Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQISX (4.9B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HQISX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.15). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQISX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQISX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HQISX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. HQISX (6.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.53 vs. HQISX (6.20).
| HQISX | RMFCX | HQISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.618 | 9.035 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 6.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.72 | 36.31 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.20 | 35.53 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.69 | 94.67 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement