Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQISX (4.89B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HQISX (1.37) vs RMFCX (1.16). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQISX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQISX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HQISX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. HQISX (6.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.39 vs. HQISX (6.30).
| HQISX | RMFCX | HQISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.379 | 8.949 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 7.42 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.30 | 32.10 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.30 | 36.39 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.33 | 90.21 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement