Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQISX vs RMFCX
HQISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQISX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HQISX (4.89B). HQISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HQISX (1.47) vs RMFCX (1.19). HQISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQISX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HQISX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HQISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HQISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HQISX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. HQISX (6.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.16 vs. HQISX (3.78).
| HQISX | RMFCX | HQISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.777 | 7.363 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 10.57 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.01 | 33.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.78 | 36.16 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.61 | 95.85 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement