Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIVX vs RMEBX
HQIVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQIVX vs RMEBX
HQIVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQIVX (4.83B). HQIVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQIVX (1.72) vs RMEBX (1.00). HQIVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQIVX (12 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HQIVX (0.65). HQIVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HQIVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HQIVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. HQIVX (3.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. HQIVX (7.13).
| HQIVX | RMEBX | HQIVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.861 | 9.246 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.83B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.00 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.65 | 7.56 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.06 | 31.88 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.13 | 36.13 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.44 | 89.32 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement