Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIVX vs RMEBX
HQIVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQIVX vs RMEBX
HQIVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQIVX (5B). HQIVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQIVX (1.66) vs RMEBX (0.99). HQIVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQIVX (12 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HQIVX (0.65). HQIVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HQIVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HQIVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. HQIVX (7.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.16 vs. HQIVX (8.30).
| HQIVX | RMEBX | HQIVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.660 | 11.878 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.99 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 9.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.99 | 37.14 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.30 | 37.16 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.52 | 92.64 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement