Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIYX vs RMFCX
HQIYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HQIYX vs RMFCX
HQIYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIYX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HQIYX (4.97B). HQIYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HQIYX (1.58) vs RMFCX (1.15). HQIYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HQIYX (23 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HQIYX (0.74). HQIYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQIYX: RMFCX (250) vs HQIYX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.56 vs. HQIYX (6.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.27 vs. HQIYX (7.88).
| HQIYX | RMFCX | HQIYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.107 | 10.915 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.97B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 9.56 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.26 | 38.97 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.88 | 37.27 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.17 | 93.12 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement