It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HQY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HQY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HQY (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.32% price change this week, while QLYS (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.53%.
HQY is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.
QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
HQY | QLYS | HQY / QLYS | |
Capitalization | 7.03B | 6.17B | 114% |
EBITDA | 284M | 190M | 149% |
Gain YTD | 57.240 | -21.862 | -262% |
P/E Ratio | 127.55 | 41.51 | 307% |
Revenue | 1B | 554M | 181% |
Total Cash | 404M | 426M | 95% |
Total Debt | 933M | 28.7M | 3,251% |
HQY | QLYS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HQY's Valuation (74) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QLYS (77) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
HQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QLYS (42) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's SMR Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HQY (84) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HQY’s over the last 12 months.
HQY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QLYS (44) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HQY (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
HQY | QLYS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 1 day ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago66% | 5 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQY has been loosely correlated with PDFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQY jumps, then PDFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HQY | 100% | -0.38% | ||
PDFS - HQY | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
PLUS - HQY | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
DOX - HQY | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
QLYS - HQY | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
VRSN - HQY | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with FOXO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then FOXO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS | 100% | +2.12% | ||
FOXO - QLYS | 52% Loosely correlated | -10.12% | ||
DJCO - QLYS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
CLSK - QLYS | 49% Loosely correlated | +16.47% | ||
COIN - QLYS | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.19% | ||
RPD - QLYS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More |