Advertisement
CPAY vs HQY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAY is a Buy and HQY is a Buy.
CPAY | HQY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPAY's Valuation (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HQY (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HQY (64) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HQY (66) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HQY’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HQY (60) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HQY (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew significantly faster than HQY’s over the last 12 months.
| CPAY | HQY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 19 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HQY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HQY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HQY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HQY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAY (@Computer Communications) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while HQY (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -6.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +14.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
HQY is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.68% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Services to the Health Industry (+14.19% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
Advertisement
CPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAY | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| HUBS - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.10% | ||
| SSNC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ADSK - CPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| CRM - CPAY | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| PCOR - CPAY | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
HQY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQY has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQY jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQY | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| EVCM - HQY | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CPAY - HQY | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| HUBS - HQY | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.10% | ||
| ALKT - HQY | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| PCOR - HQY | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||