HR
Price
$20.81
Change
+$0.12 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.21B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMH
Price
$15.41
Change
+$0.13 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HR vs UMH

HR vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HR vs. UMH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HR is a StrongBuy and UMH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HR: $20.81 vs. UMH: $15.41)
Brand notoriety: HR and UMH are both not notable
HR represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while UMH is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HR: 85% vs. UMH: 71%
Market capitalization -- HR: $7.21B vs. UMH: $1.31B
HR [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $7.21B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $165.57B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $15.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $9.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HR and UMH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the short-term than HR.

Price Growth

HR (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.42%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

HR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-0.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Media Conglomerates (-1.10% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HR($7.21B) has a higher market cap than UMH($1.31B). HR YTD gains are higher at: 25.885 vs. UMH (-0.293). HR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 581M vs. UMH (130M). UMH has more cash in the bank: 63.8M vs. HR (26.2M). UMH has less debt than HR: UMH (760M) vs HR (4.34B). HR has higher revenues than UMH: HR (1.13B) vs UMH (266M).
HRUMHHR / UMH
Capitalization7.21B1.31B550%
EBITDA581M130M447%
Gain YTD25.885-0.293-8,833%
P/E RatioN/A154.10-
Revenue1.13B266M426%
Total Cash26.2M63.8M41%
Total Debt4.34B760M571%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HR vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
HR
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4369
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7441
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HR's Valuation (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (21). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

HR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (100). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as HR (93). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to HR’s over the last 12 months.

HR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (69). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HR (74). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REXR34.750.63
+1.85%
Rexford Industrial Realty
AACG0.95N/A
+0.09%
ATA Creativity Global
LAFAU10.16N/A
N/A
Lafayette Acquisition Corp
MPLT36.57-2.75
-6.99%
MapLight Therapeutics Inc.
PROK1.61-0.15
-8.52%
ProKidney Corp

HR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HR has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HR jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HR
1D Price
Change %
HR100%
+0.58%
FRT - HR
68%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
UMH - HR
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
GLPI - HR
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
O - HR
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
PSA - HR
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

UMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMH
1D Price
Change %
UMH100%
+0.85%
REG - UMH
66%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
DOC - UMH
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
BFS - UMH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
DBRG - UMH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
FRT - UMH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
More