HR
Price
$17.45
Change
+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.16B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMH
Price
$15.42
Change
+$0.09 (+0.59%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.33B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HR vs UMH

HR vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HR vs. UMH commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HR is a StrongBuy and UMH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HR vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
HR
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HR's Valuation (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (23). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

HR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (100). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as HR (91). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to HR’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as HR (58). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to HR’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HR (65). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HR: $17.43 vs. UMH: $15.33)
Brand notoriety: HR and UMH are both not notable
HR represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while UMH is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HR: 121% vs. UMH: 102%
Market capitalization -- HR: $6.16B vs. UMH: $1.33B
HR [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $6.16B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $113.09K to $167.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $524.6K to $47.49B. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $16.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $9.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UMH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the long-term than HR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HR is a better buy in the short-term than UMH.

Price Growth

HR (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

HR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-2.52% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Media Conglomerates (-2.52% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

View a ticker or compare two or three
HR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALMU12.580.22
+1.78%
AELUMA INC
HFWA27.890.26
+0.94%
Heritage Financial Corp
IBN27.51-0.04
-0.15%
ICICI Bank Limited
SAIC126.30-1.26
-0.99%
Science Applications International Corp
MWYN1.00-0.12
-11.04%
Marwynn Holdings Inc.

HR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HR has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HR jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HR
1D Price
Change %
HR100%
-1.75%
FRT - HR
68%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
UMH - HR
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
GLPI - HR
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
O - HR
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
PSA - HR
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

UMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMH
1D Price
Change %
UMH100%
-0.45%
REG - UMH
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
DOC - UMH
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
BFS - UMH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
DBRG - UMH
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRT - UMH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More