HRB vs LIND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRB is a StrongSell and LIND is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HRB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HRB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HRB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIND’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HRB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- LIND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HRB (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while LIND (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
HRB is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
LIND is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-2.16% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| HRB | LIND | HRB / LIND | |
| Capitalization | 6.73B | 483M | 1,393% |
| EBITDA | 935M | 54.8M | 1,706% |
| Gain YTD | 26.564 | 16.415 | 162% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.39 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.49B | 570M | 612% |
| Total Cash | 321M | 157M | 204% |
| Total Debt | 2.68B | 624M | 430% |
HRB | LIND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIND's Valuation (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HRB (80). This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to HRB’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100). This means that HRB’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100). This means that HRB’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HRB (49). This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to HRB’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (98). This means that HRB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
| HRB | LIND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 77% |
HRB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HRB and TNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRB and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HRB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRB | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| TNL - HRB | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| LIND - HRB | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISPO - HRB | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CSV - HRB | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| WW - HRB | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.24% | ||
More | ||||
LIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been closely correlated with NCLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then NCLH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | 100% | N/A | ||
| NCLH - LIND | 68% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CCL - LIND | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TRIP - LIND | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.39% | ||
| RCL - LIND | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| TNL - LIND | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||