Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCIX vs RGEBX
HRCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HRCIX vs RGEBX
HRCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCIX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HRCIX (642M). HRCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HRCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HRCIX (20 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HRCIX (0.73). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. HRCIX (16.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCIX: RGEBX (250) vs HRCIX (10000). HRCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. RGEBX (3.42). HRCIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.44 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| HRCIX | RGEBX | HRCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.099 | 6.888 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 3.42 | 548% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.04 | 36.26 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | 12.32 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.20 | 93.96 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement