Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCIX vs RGEBX
HRCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HRCIX vs RGEBX
HRCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCIX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. HRCIX (638M). HRCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HRCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HRCIX (20 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HRCIX (0.73). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. HRCIX (16.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCIX: RGEBX (250) vs HRCIX (10000). HRCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.66 vs. RGEBX (11.13). HRCIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.47 vs. RGEBX (15.42).
| HRCIX | RGEBX | HRCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.301 | 8.479 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 638M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.66 | 11.13 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.69 | 45.29 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.47 | 15.42 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.40 | 108.69 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement