Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCPX vs RGEBX
HRCPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HRCPX vs RGEBX
HRCPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HRCPX (642M). HRCPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HRCPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HRCPX (41 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HRCPX (1.00). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. HRCPX (16.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCPX: RGEBX (250) vs HRCPX (1000). HRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.42 vs. RGEBX (3.42). HRCPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.68 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| HRCPX | RGEBX | HRCPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.08 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.08 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.938 | 6.888 | 115% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.42 | 3.42 | 538% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 36.26 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | 12.32 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.13 | 93.96 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement