Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCVX vs RMEBX
HRCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HRCVX vs RMEBX
HRCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HRCVX (502M). HRCVX (1.06) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . HRCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HRCVX (39 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HRCVX (0.97). HRCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HRCVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. HRCVX (3.92). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. HRCVX (-11.52).
| HRCVX | RMEBX | HRCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.796 | 5.801 | 152% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 9.98 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.41 | 34.14 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.52 | 32.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.32 | 89.84 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement