Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCVX vs RMEBX
HRCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HRCVX vs RMEBX
HRCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HRCVX (488M). RMEBX (0.99) and HRCVX (0.98) have matching dividends . HRCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HRCVX (40 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HRCVX (0.97). HRCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HRCVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. HRCVX (-6.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. HRCVX (-12.69).
| HRCVX | RMEBX | HRCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.100 | 8.448 | 120% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.99 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.31 | 4.65 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.38 | 34.88 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.69 | 34.68 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.61 | 92.45 | 31% |