Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCVX vs RMFCX
HRCVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HRCVX vs RMFCX
HRCVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HRCVX (502M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HRCVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs HRCVX (1.06). HRCVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HRCVX (40 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HRCVX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HRCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCVX: RMFCX (250) vs HRCVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. HRCVX (-0.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. HRCVX (-11.82).
| HRCVX | RMFCX | HRCVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.152 | 9.137 | 111% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 8.88 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.05 | 34.84 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.82 | 37.23 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.43 | 91.06 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement