Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCVX vs RMFCX
HRCVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HRCVX vs RMFCX
HRCVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HRCVX (502M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HRCVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HRCVX (1.06). HRCVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HRCVX (39 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HRCVX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HRCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCVX: RMFCX (250) vs HRCVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. HRCVX (3.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. HRCVX (-11.52).
| HRCVX | RMFCX | HRCVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.796 | 5.845 | 150% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 10.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.41 | 34.65 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.52 | 33.85 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.32 | 91.46 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement