Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCVX vs RMFEX
HRCVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HRCVX vs RMFEX
HRCVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HRCVX (502M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HRCVX: RMFEX (1.42) vs HRCVX (1.06). HRCVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HRCVX (40 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HRCVX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HRCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCVX: RMFEX (250) vs HRCVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. HRCVX (-0.55). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. HRCVX (-11.82).
| HRCVX | RMFEX | HRCVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.152 | 9.303 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.42 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 9.23 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.05 | 36.13 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.82 | 39.39 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.43 | 99.14 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement