Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRLAX vs RIDAX
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts HRLAX vs RIDAX
Hartford Real Asset A
Price$9.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.59M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$26.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRLAX vs. RIDAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRLAX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. HRLAX (61.6M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: HRLAX (3.25) vs RIDAX (2.97). HRLAX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: HRLAX (15 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). HRLAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.36). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RIDAX (92.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: RIDAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. HRLAX (8.68). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.56 vs. RIDAX (40.27).
| HRLAX | RIDAX | HRLAX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.36 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.36 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.504 | 11.068 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.6M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 14.33 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.65 | 24.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 40.27 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.92 | 43.99 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement