Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRLAX vs RIDAX
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts HRLAX vs RIDAX
Hartford Real Asset A
Price$9.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.61M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$26.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRLAX vs. RIDAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRLAX is a Hold and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HRLAX (61.6M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: HRLAX (3.26) vs RIDAX (2.98). HRLAX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: HRLAX (15 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). HRLAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.36). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RIDAX (92.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: RIDAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. HRLAX (11.06). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.65 vs. RIDAX (33.43).
| HRLAX | RIDAX | HRLAX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.36 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.36 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.382 | 10.568 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.6M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.98 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.06 | 13.39 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 21.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.65 | 33.43 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.80 | 42.40 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement