Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRLAX vs RIDAX
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts HRLAX vs RIDAX
HRLAX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRLAX vs. RIDAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRLAX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLAX (67M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: HRLAX (3.17) vs RIDAX (2.76). HRLAX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: HRLAX (16 years) vs RIDAX (24 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.34). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RIDAX (65.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: RIDAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. RIDAX (7.40). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.92 vs. RIDAX (18.59).
| HRLAX | RIDAX | HRLAX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.34 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.34 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.759 | 6.609 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67M | 147B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 2.76 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.98 | 7.40 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.44 | 32.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.92 | 18.59 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.54 | 54.08 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers