HRZN
Price
$6.91
Change
-$0.05 (-0.72%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
293.99M
53 days until earnings call
OCSL
Price
$13.97
Change
+$0.14 (+1.01%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRZN vs OCSL

Header iconHRZN vs OCSL Comparison
Open Charts HRZN vs OCSLBanner chart's image
Horizon Technology Finance
Price$6.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.72%)
Volume$608.66K
Capitalization293.99M
Oaktree Specialty Lending
Price$13.97
Change+$0.14 (+1.01%)
Volume$387.22K
Capitalization1.23B
HRZN vs OCSL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRZN vs. OCSL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRZN is a Hold and OCSL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HRZN: $6.91 vs. OCSL: $13.97)
Brand notoriety: HRZN and OCSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRZN: 106% vs. OCSL: 73%
Market capitalization -- HRZN: $293.99M vs. OCSL: $1.23B
HRZN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $293.99M. OCSL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRZN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOCSL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HRZN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OCSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the long-term than HRZN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRZN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCSL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HRZN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HRZN and OCSL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HRZN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while OCSL (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRZN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

OCSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCSL($1.23B) has a higher market cap than HRZN($294M). OCSL YTD gains are higher at: -2.920 vs. HRZN (-14.430). HRZN has less debt than OCSL: HRZN (467M) vs OCSL (1.45B). OCSL has higher revenues than HRZN: OCSL (35.8M) vs HRZN (-39.13M).
HRZNOCSLHRZN / OCSL
Capitalization294M1.23B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.430-2.920494%
P/E RatioN/A24.51-
Revenue-39.13M35.8M-109%
Total Cash33MN/A-
Total Debt467M1.45B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRZN vs OCSL: Fundamental Ratings
HRZN
OCSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
9436
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3755

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCSL's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (7). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRZN (100). This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRZN (94). This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (81). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as OCSL (25). This means that HRZN’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRZNOCSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECTM0.600.02
+3.45%
ECA Marcellus Trust I
VLVLY29.510.28
+0.96%
Volvo AB
SALRY12.93N/A
N/A
Salmar ASA
BREUF10.88N/A
N/A
Bridgemarq Real Estate Svc Inc.
OXINF24.28N/A
N/A
Oxford Instruments plc

HRZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRZN has been loosely correlated with SCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRZN jumps, then SCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRZN
1D Price
Change %
HRZN100%
-0.72%
SCM - HRZN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
NMFC - HRZN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
OCSL - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
GLAD - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
FSK - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

OCSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCSL
1D Price
Change %
OCSL100%
+1.01%
BCSF - OCSL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
TSLX - OCSL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
NMFC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
SLRC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
OBDC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More