Advertisement
NMFC vs OCSL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a Hold and OCSL is a Hold.
| NMFC | OCSL | NMFC / OCSL | |
| Capitalization | 660M | 1.09B | 60% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.288 | 6.737 | -227% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.50 | 25.86 | 207% |
| Revenue | -53.58M | 53.5M | -100% |
| Total Cash | 27.2M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 1.44B | 94% |
NMFC | OCSL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCSL's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMFC (66). This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
OCSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (100). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
OCSL's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMFC (78). This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
OCSL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (59). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
NMFC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as OCSL (31). This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.
| NMFC | OCSL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 37% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 37% | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 35% | 5 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 44% | 12 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 31% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NMFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while OCSL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NMFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OCSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NMFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCSL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NMFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- OCSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.01% price change this week, while OCSL (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
NMFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
OCSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+1.31% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCTCX | 53.33 | 0.05 | +0.09% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C | |||
| RNPGX | 75.21 | -0.07 | -0.09% |
| American Funds New Perspective R-6 | |||
| WAMFX | 24.06 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| Boston Trust Walden Midcap | |||
| EISDX | 37.35 | -0.12 | -0.32% |
| Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock C | |||
| GMBCX | 19.02 | -0.26 | -1.35% |
| GMO International Opportunistic Val R6 | |||
NMFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMFC | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| ARCC - NMFC | 70% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| GBDC - NMFC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| OCSL - NMFC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| BCSF - NMFC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| CGBD - NMFC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||
OCSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCSL | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| ARCC - OCSL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| GBDC - OCSL | 70% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| PFLT - OCSL | 69% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| BCSF - OCSL | 68% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| BXSL - OCSL | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||