Advertisement
HSDT vs MLCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSDT is a Buy and MLCI is a StrongBuy.
HSDT | MLCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MLCI's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HSDT (92) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that MLCI’s stock grew significantly faster than HSDT’s over the last 12 months.
MLCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HSDT (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that MLCI’s stock grew similarly to HSDT’s over the last 12 months.
MLCI's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as HSDT (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that MLCI’s stock grew similarly to HSDT’s over the last 12 months.
HSDT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as MLCI (60) in the null industry. This means that HSDT’s stock grew similarly to MLCI’s over the last 12 months.
HSDT's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCI (64) in the null industry. This means that HSDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCI’s over the last 12 months.
| HSDT | MLCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 17% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 3 days ago 66% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSDT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MLCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HSDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLCI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HSDT (@Investment Managers) experienced а +25.22% price change this week, while MLCI (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +6.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
HSDT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
MLCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+6.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GXUS | 64.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) | |||
| BGLD | 16.70 | -0.19 | -1.12% |
| FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) | |||
| CGXU | 35.10 | -0.71 | -1.98% |
| Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) | |||
| EEMX | 53.63 | -1.17 | -2.14% |
| State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EEMX) | |||
| IPOS | 21.92 | -0.61 | -2.71% |
| Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) | |||
HSDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSDT has been loosely correlated with MLCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSDT jumps, then MLCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSDT | 100% | -11.93% | ||
| MLCI - HSDT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| DFDV - HSDT | 54% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
| ASST - HSDT | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| FGNX - HSDT | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| HSCS - HSDT | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||
MLCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCI has been loosely correlated with HSDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLCI jumps, then HSDT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCI | 100% | +1.99% | ||
| HSDT - MLCI | 60% Loosely correlated | -11.93% | ||
| HLNE - MLCI | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
| TPG - MLCI | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| CRBG - MLCI | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| EQH - MLCI | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||