Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$38.47
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.54M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.26
Change-$0.25 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.22M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. WCMLX (45.2M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLAX (1.25) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. HSLAX (-7.47). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. HSLAX (-21.47).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.990 | 5.054 | -20% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 45.2M | 655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.47 | 8.17 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.97 | 11.56 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.47 | 20.41 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement