Ad is loading...
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$32.86
Change+$2.88 (+9.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.88M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.21M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 239M vs. WCMLX (36.2M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLAX (1.37) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.32). HSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -23.04 vs. HSLAX (-28.80). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. HSLAX (-22.54).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.99 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.86 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.909 | -22.084 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 36.2M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.80 | -23.04 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.92 | -15.01 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.54 | 17.47 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...