Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$40.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.71M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLAX (1.14) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. HSLAX (-12.62). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. HSLAX (-30.69).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.523 | 1.400 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 41.1M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -2.18 | 580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.49 | 20.96 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.69 | -0.99 | 3,110% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.49 | N/A | - |