Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$41.62
Change+$0.65 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.65M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.04
Change+$0.25 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMLX (43M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLAX (1.18) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. HSLAX (-11.32). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. HSLAX (-23.51).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.985 | 7.232 | 55% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 43M | 695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.32 | 1.70 | -668% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.39 | 33.88 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.51 | 12.48 | -188% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement