Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 315M vs. WCMLX (52.4M). HSLAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.40). HSLAX (92.00) and WCMLX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). HSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. WCMLX (25.84). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. HSLAX (-24.08).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.99 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.435 | 9.375 | 197% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 52.4M | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.38 | 25.84 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.96 | 32.13 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.08 | -0.07 | 36,259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement