Ad is loading...
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$37.29
Change+$1.33 (+3.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.49M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.24
Change+$0.50 (+4.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 270M vs. WCMLX (42M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.51) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.53 vs. HSLCX (-17.11). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 29.01 vs. HSLCX (-33.23).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.888 | -8.709 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 42M | 643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.11 | -6.53 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.88 | 10.75 | -83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.23 | 29.01 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...