Ad is loading...
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$33.48
Change+$0.20 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.55M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.09M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. WCMLX (39.1M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.50) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). HSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.54 vs. HSLCX (-19.51). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.40 vs. HSLCX (-36.85).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.86 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.895 | -15.941 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 39.1M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.51 | -11.54 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.96 | -7.21 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.85 | 24.40 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | -60.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers