Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$42.79
Change+$0.18 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.18M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.31M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 300M vs. WCMLX (44.3M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.44) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. HSLCX (-8.33). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.00 vs. HSLCX (-36.16).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.222 | 8.243 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 44.3M | 677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.33 | 6.34 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 31.32 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.16 | 22.00 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement