Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$41.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.71M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.42) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. HSLCX (-13.00). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. HSLCX (-46.41).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.703 | 1.400 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 41.1M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.00 | -2.18 | 598% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.95 | 20.96 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.41 | -0.99 | 4,702% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.09 | N/A | - |