Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$39.81
Change+$0.45 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. WCMLX (43M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.47) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.91 vs. HSLCX (-9.61). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.91 vs. HSLCX (-36.19).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.561 | -0.933 | 382% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 43M | 684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | 2.91 | -330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | 26.01 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.19 | 21.91 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement