Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$37.34
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.56M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.96
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.22M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. WCMLX (42.2M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.49) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.79 vs. HSLCX (-15.29). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. HSLCX (-40.84).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.271 | -7.232 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 42.2M | 664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.29 | -3.79 | 403% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.30 | 10.67 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.84 | 13.19 | -310% |
| Returns for 10 years | -55.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement