Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$39.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.35M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.18M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. WCMLX (44.2M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.47) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. HSLCX (-15.29). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.18 vs. HSLCX (-38.85).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.900 | 1.866 | -209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 44.2M | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | 16.76 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.85 | 21.18 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement