Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$41.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.05M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.68
Change-$0.22 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.71M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. WCMLX (44.7M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.45) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. HSLCX (-7.90). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.36 vs. HSLCX (-35.19).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.921 | 6.376 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 44.7M | 662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.90 | 7.63 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.43 | 24.70 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.19 | 24.36 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement