Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). HSLCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (25 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). HSLCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). HSLCX (92.00) and WCMLX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). HSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.12 vs. WCMLX (17.02). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. HSLCX (-38.44).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.99 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.79 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.214 | 11.410 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 51.9M | 557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.12 | 17.02 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.46 | 32.50 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.44 | 3.16 | -1,215% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement