Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$38.84
Change+$0.61 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 268M vs. WCMNX (42.1M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLFX (1.67) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. HSLFX (-15.75). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. HSLFX (-14.92).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.11 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.252 | -9.299 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 42.1M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.75 | -7.10 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.43 | 14.99 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.92 | 19.77 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...