Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$46.43
Change+$0.61 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.67M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.74
Change+$0.20 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLFX (1.42) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. HSLFX (-7.28). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.17 vs. HSLFX (-18.53).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.04 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.971 | 6.698 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 43.7M | 684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.28 | 4.48 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.10 | 34.06 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.53 | 11.17 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement