Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$42.19
Change+$0.39 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.04M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.74
Change+$0.23 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. WCMNX (42.8M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLFX (1.53) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.27 vs. HSLFX (-16.97). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.76 vs. HSLFX (-16.45).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.04 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.151 | -2.285 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 42.8M | 668% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.97 | -6.27 | 271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.10 | 20.39 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.45 | 16.76 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement