Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$45.26
Change+$0.20 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.28
Change+$0.08 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.83M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 346M vs. WCMNX (41.8M). HSLFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). HSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. HSLFX (6.51). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.39 vs. HSLFX (-14.87).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 4.649 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 41.8M | 828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 11.60 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.23 | 6.92 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | 21.39 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers