Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$35.83
Change+$0.55 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.63
Change+$0.15 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. WCMNX (38.5M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLFX (1.65) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.85). HSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.15 vs. HSLFX (-22.92). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.00 vs. HSLFX (-13.65).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 2.11 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.946 | -17.415 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 38.5M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.92 | -17.15 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.44 | -10.12 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.65 | 23.00 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...