Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. WCMNX (50M). HSLFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (10 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.90). HSLFX (92.00) and WCMNX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). HSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. WCMNX (7.88). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -5.66 vs. HSLFX (-24.07).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.04 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.888 | 7.085 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 50M | 560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 7.88 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.32 | 26.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.07 | -5.66 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement