Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSMBX vs NAESX
HSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HSMBX vs NAESX
HSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSMBX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. HSMBX (793M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HSMBX: NAESX (1.07) vs HSMBX (0.24). HSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HSMBX (3 years) vs NAESX (66 years). HSMBX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSMBX: NAESX (0) vs HSMBX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.90 vs. HSMBX (24.21).
| HSMBX | NAESX | HSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.17 | 729% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.17 | 729% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.739 | 17.618 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 793M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.21 | 26.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.31 | 53.82 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.13 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 339.33 | 170.34 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement