Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSMCX vs WCMLX
HSMCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSMCX vs WCMLX
HSMCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSMCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSMCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSMCX has more cash in the bank: 650M vs. WCMLX (46.1M). HSMCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSMCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSMCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). HSMCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. HSMCX (71.00). HSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSMCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). HSMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.36 vs. WCMLX (1.00). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -8.93 vs. HSMCX (-37.90).
| HSMCX | WCMLX | HSMCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.99 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.79 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.547 | 3.052 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 650M | 46.1M | 1,410% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.36 | 1.00 | 1,440% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.17 | 28.09 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.90 | -8.93 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement