Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSPGX vs WCMLX
HSPGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSPGX vs WCMLX
HSPGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSPGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSPGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSPGX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). HSPGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSPGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSPGX (34 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSPGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. HSPGX (45.00). HSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSPGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. HSPGX (-3.74). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. HSPGX (-29.67).
| HSPGX | WCMLX | HSPGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.99 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.216 | 3.852 | -213% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 47.2M | 2,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.74 | 2.81 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.24 | 23.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.67 | -7.51 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement