Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSPGX vs WCMNX
HSPGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSPGX vs WCMNX
HSPGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSPGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSPGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSPGX has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. WCMNX (53.1M). HSPGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSPGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSPGX (34 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSPGX (1.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. HSPGX (45.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSPGX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSPGX (2000). HSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.85 vs. WCMNX (25.42). HSPGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.33 vs. WCMNX (-1.40).
| HSPGX | WCMNX | HSPGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.24 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.052 | 9.225 | 261% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 53.1M | 2,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.85 | 25.42 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.43 | 31.21 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.33 | -1.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement