Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSPGX vs WCMNX
HSPGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSPGX vs WCMNX
HSPGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSPGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSPGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSPGX has more cash in the bank: 1.48B vs. WCMNX (51.9M). HSPGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSPGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSPGX (34 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSPGX (1.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. HSPGX (45.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSPGX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSPGX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.65 vs. HSPGX (9.25). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. HSPGX (-21.77).
| HSPGX | WCMNX | HSPGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.24 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.011 | 11.144 | -27% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 51.9M | 2,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 16.65 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.76 | 31.41 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.77 | 1.76 | -1,239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers