Advertisement
HSTM vs QTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSTM is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.
HSTM's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HSTM turned positive on September 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where HSTM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 29, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HSTM as a result. In 62 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
Following a +1.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HSTM advanced for three days, in 169 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 112 of 201 cases where HSTM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 56%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 15 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HSTM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
HSTM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 14 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HSTM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HSTM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 97, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 91 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.968) is normal, around the industry mean (3.981). HSTM has a moderately high P/E Ratio (48.042) as compared to the industry average of (13.628). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.857) is also within normal values, averaging (2.133). Dividend Yield (0.004) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.711) is also within normal values, averaging (6.065).
QTWO in upward trend: 10-day moving average moved above 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026
The 10-day moving average for QTWO crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on QTWO as a result. In 57 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QTWO just turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where QTWO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
QTWO moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +5.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QTWO advanced for three days, in 197 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QTWO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
QTWO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for QTWO entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. QTWO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.436) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.734). P/E Ratio (44.872) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.183). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.074) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.643) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QTWO’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
HSTM | QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 14 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QTWO's Valuation (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HSTM (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HSTM’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's SMR Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HSTM (81) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HSTM’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (38) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| HSTM | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 53% | 25 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while QTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HSTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HSTM (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
HSTM is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-1.51% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (-0.43% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
HSTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSTM has been loosely correlated with WAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSTM jumps, then WAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSTM | 100% | +3.22% | ||
| WAY - HSTM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| DOCN - HSTM | 38% Loosely correlated | -9.34% | ||
| QTWO - HSTM | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.41% | ||
| PLTR - HSTM | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| MYSZ - HSTM | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.59% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | +4.41% | ||
| PCOR - QTWO | 70% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| WK - QTWO | 69% Closely correlated | +5.89% | ||
| NCNO - QTWO | 65% Loosely correlated | +6.09% | ||
| WDAY - QTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| BL - QTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | +8.90% | ||
More | ||||