Advertisement
HTLD vs SNDR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTLD is a Hold and SNDR is a Hold.
| HTLD | SNDR | HTLD / SNDR | |
| Capitalization | 918M | 5.72B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 624M | 21% |
| Gain YTD | 31.895 | 24.127 | 132% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.32 | 50.95 | 103% |
| Revenue | 736M | 5.82B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 62.4M | 327M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 146M | 396M | 37% |
HTLD | SNDR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNDR's Valuation (37) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as HTLD (64). This means that SNDR’s stock grew similarly to HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
SNDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTLD (100). This means that SNDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
SNDR's SMR Rating (86) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as HTLD (92). This means that SNDR’s stock grew similarly to HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
SNDR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as HTLD (50). This means that SNDR’s stock grew similarly to HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
HTLD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as SNDR (11). This means that HTLD’s stock grew similarly to SNDR’s over the last 12 months.
| HTLD | SNDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 72% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SNDR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HTLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNDR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HTLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SNDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HTLD (@Trucking) experienced а -3.81% price change this week, while SNDR (@Trucking) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
HTLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
SNDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucking (+0.31% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GOCT | 42.56 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) | |||
| XTAP | 46.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) | |||
| MUB | 102.88 | -0.28 | -0.27% |
| iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB) | |||
| ECH | 39.45 | -0.15 | -0.38% |
| iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) | |||
| IBGA | 23.13 | -0.16 | -0.70% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) | |||
HTLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTLD has been closely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTLD jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTLD | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| CVLG - HTLD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MRTN - HTLD | 76% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| WERN - HTLD | 73% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| SNDR - HTLD | 72% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| ARCB - HTLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
SNDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNDR has been closely correlated with WERN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNDR jumps, then WERN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNDR | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| WERN - SNDR | 83% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KNX - SNDR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| HTLD - SNDR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| TFII - SNDR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| MRTN - SNDR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||